Recreating Shakespeare: A Qualitative Inquiry into Authorship, Style and Simulation in the Age of Generative AI

लेखक

  • Dhruvika Jakharia KJ Somaiya College of Arts and Commerce (Autonomous), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Author
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation

संकेत शब्द:

artificial intelligence, Shakespeare, authorship, large language models, computational creativity, digital humanities, literary identity

सार

The growing unification of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into creative practises has unresolved prolonged assumptions about individual artistry, authenticity and authorial identity. AI systems are capable of writing poetry, drama, fiction and other literary texts. The question is not about whether algorithmic machines can generate academic texts, but how they reproduce and mirror identities conventionally associated with human writers. This progress leads to a wider issue in which a well-known literary voice can be reconstructed from the patterns found in already-existing works computationally. Hence, the challenge is to figure out the relationship between style and authorship, originality and replicated text or literary recognition and individual artistic autonomy. With this upcoming backdrop, Shakespeare acts as a specifically targeted case through which we analyse the AI formation of literary identity. Shakespeare’s writing style, stylistic characteristics have become identifiable to an extent that they can be provoked as a model of machine-generated production. This research paper explores what happens to the idea of Shakespeare—as writer, stylistic features and cultural motifs when AI models are tasked with recreating him. Instead of questioning if AI can generate convincing pastiche, the paper asks a more significant question. It asks, “what kind of Shakespeare does AI actually produce and what does the formation unmask about the identity?” Relying on the poststructuralist theories of authorship (Barthes, 1967/1977; Foucault, 1969), computational creativity theory (Boden, 2004), and empirical research on stylometry and large language model (LLM) style recreation, this qualitative paper examines AI-driven Shakespeare-recreation projects — from LSTM and GPT-2 pastiche generators to modern LLM benchmarking studies. The investigation finds that AI does not recreate Shakespeare's authorial mindfulness. It reconstructs an average, decontextualized "Shakespeare-function".  It is a surface level rhythm of diction, syntax, and meter taken from ancestral, sources, and biographical peculiarity. This conclusion has implications for literary pedagogy, digital humanities methodology, copyright law, and the ethics of algorithmic cultural memory.

10 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dhruvika Jakharia, KJ Somaiya College of Arts and Commerce (Autonomous), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Research Scholar

References

1. Anthropic. (2022). Predictability and surprise in large generative models. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.07785

2. Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text (S. Heath, Trans.). Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1967)

3. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). Routledge.

4. Bridy, A. (2012). Coding creativity: Copyright and the artificially intelligent author. Stanford Technology Law Review, 5, 1–28.

5. Burke, S. (1998). The death and return of the author: Criticism and subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

6. Chaturvedi, K. (n.d.). AI-Shakespeare-NLP-Driven-Text-Generation [Software repository]. GitHub. https://github.com/kabirchaturvedi/AI-Shakespeare-NLP-Driven-Text-Generation

7. Craig, C. J., & Kerr, I. R. (2021). The death of the AI author. Ottawa Law Review, 52(1), 33–86.

8. Dataloop. (n.d.). Shakespeare [Model documentation]. https://dataloop.ai/library/model/israhassan_shakespeare/

9. Decoding AI authorship: Can LLMs truly mimic human style across literature and politics? (2026). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.23219

10. Desdevises, J. (2025). The paradox of creativity in generative AI: High performance, human-like bias, and limited differential evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1628486

11. Divon, T., & Pentzold, C. (2025). Artificially alive: An exploration of AI resurrections and spectral labor modes in a postmortal society. [Sage journal]. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448251397518

12. Eisen, M., Segarra, S., Egan, G., & Ribeiro, A. (2016). Stylometric analysis of early modern period English plays. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.05670

13. Flory, C. (2025, February 22). Shakespeare vs. the LLMs — Humans vs AI. Medium. https://medium.com/@clive_59987/shakespeare-vs-the-llms-humans-vs-ai-b44853d42a33

14. Foucault, M. (1969). What is an author? [As discussed in Open University, Artists and authorship: The case of Raphael]. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/artists-and-authorship-the-case-raphael/content-section-1.3

15. Fox, N., et al. (2012). [Cited in] Open set authorship attribution toward demystifying Victorian periodicals. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.08259

16. Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2022). DeepCreativity: Measuring creativity with deep learning techniques. [Cited in Creativity in AI as emergence from domain-limited generative models, arXiv]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.08388

17. Generation, evaluation, and explanation of novelists' styles with single-token prompts. (2025). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.20459

18. Harbinja, E. (2025). Digital remains and post-mortem privacy in the UK: What do we protect and why? International Journal of Law and Information Technology.

19. Historica.org. (2026a). Simulating the past: Ethics of AI historical chatbots. https://www.historica.org/blog/simulating-the-past-ethics-of-ai-historical-chatbots

20. Historica.org. (2026b). AI replicas of historical figures: Ethics & impact. https://www.historica.org/blog/ai-historical-replicas-ethics

21. HyperWrite AI. (n.d.). Write like Shakespeare [AI writing tool]. https://www.hyperwriteai.com/aitools/write-like-shakespeare

22. Hutson, J., & Ratican, J. (2023). Life, death, and AI: Exploring digital necromancy in popular culture — Ethical considerations, technological limitations, and the pet cemetery conundrum. Lindenwood University Digital Commons.

23. Jemama, R., & Kumar, R. (2025). How well do LLMs imitate human writing style? [Accepted, IEEE UEMCON 2025]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.24930

24. Khadim, S. (2023, April 11). Generating Shakespeare style text with fine-tuned GPT-2. LinkedIn Pulse. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/generating-shakespearean-text-fine-tuned-gpt-2-sawera-khadim

25. Lindenwood case study. (n.d.). A case study on Mary Sibley through customized ChatGPT. Lindenwood University Digital Commons.

26. Noema Magazine. (2025, June 4). AI signals the death of the author. https://www.noemamag.com/ai-signals-the-death-of-the-author/

27. Pataranutaporn, P., et al. (2023). [Living Memories concept, cited in A platform for interactive AI character experiences]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.01027

28. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Artificial Intelligence Act). (2024). Official Journal of the European Union.

29. Škobo, M., & Šović, M. (2025). The digital doppelgängers of Nikola Tesla and Branislav Nušić: A new approach to interactive learning and cultural heritage. [Cited in Historica.org, 2026b].

30. Somers, H. (n.d.). Stylometry and authorship [Lecture slides]. University of Manchester https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/harold.somers/LELA30922/Authorship.ppt

31. Springer AI & Ethics journal synthesis. (2026). From Barthes to algorithms: Reimagining authorship and reader agency in the AI era. AI and Ethics. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01108-0

Aethel Research Digest Juncture: An International Journal

Downloads

प्रकाशित

2026-10-30

अंक

खंड 2 No. Special Issue 01 (2026): The English Odyssey: Shakespeare to AI (A 360° Journey of Language and Literature)

खंड

Special Issue: The English Odyssey

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dhruvika Jakharia (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

"All articles published in 'Aethel Research Digest Juncture: An International Journal (ARDJIJ)' are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited. Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication."

How to Cite

Recreating Shakespeare: A Qualitative Inquiry into Authorship, Style and Simulation in the Age of Generative AI. (2026). Aethel Research Digest Juncture: An International Journal, 2(Special Issue 01), 27-39. https://ardjij.com/index.php/ardjij/article/view/55